<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pittsburgh Perl Workshop 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://divisionbyzero.net/blog/2007/10/18/pittsburgh-perl-workshop-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://divisionbyzero.net/blog/2007/10/18/pittsburgh-perl-workshop-2007/</link>
	<description>question . authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:06:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Moertel</title>
		<link>http://divisionbyzero.net/blog/2007/10/18/pittsburgh-perl-workshop-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Moertel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 03:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divisionbyzero.net/blog/2007/10/18/pittsburgh-perl-workshop-2007/#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Brad,

I thought your talk was great. I missed the end because of my conference-organizer duties, but what I saw impressed me. You took an interesting topic and presented it in a way that *kept* it interesting. That&#039;s the way to do it.

The way you piled up the real-world constraints until they crushed the perfect-world security models that people carry around in their heads was particularly instructive: it helped the audience *see* that real-world security is messy and must accommodate stuff that nobody can anticipate. That&#039;s why the sane approach is to be nimble, monitor what&#039;s going on, and be prepared to solve problems as they reveal themselves.

Very cool talk.

Cheers,
Tom

BTW, I will be sorely disappointed if you don&#039;t submit a talk for next year&#039;s PPW.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad,</p>
<p>I thought your talk was great. I missed the end because of my conference-organizer duties, but what I saw impressed me. You took an interesting topic and presented it in a way that *kept* it interesting. That&#8217;s the way to do it.</p>
<p>The way you piled up the real-world constraints until they crushed the perfect-world security models that people carry around in their heads was particularly instructive: it helped the audience *see* that real-world security is messy and must accommodate stuff that nobody can anticipate. That&#8217;s why the sane approach is to be nimble, monitor what&#8217;s going on, and be prepared to solve problems as they reveal themselves.</p>
<p>Very cool talk.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Tom</p>
<p>BTW, I will be sorely disappointed if you don&#8217;t submit a talk for next year&#8217;s PPW.  ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Wright</title>
		<link>http://divisionbyzero.net/blog/2007/10/18/pittsburgh-perl-workshop-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divisionbyzero.net/blog/2007/10/18/pittsburgh-perl-workshop-2007/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>I only saw bits and pieces as I was in and out, but I heard great reviews.

-Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only saw bits and pieces as I was in and out, but I heard great reviews.</p>
<p>-Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
