<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pittsburgh Perl Workshop 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://divisionbyzero.net/blog/2007/10/18/pittsburgh-perl-workshop-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://divisionbyzero.net/blog/2007/10/18/pittsburgh-perl-workshop-2007/</link>
	<description>question . authority</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Moertel</title>
		<link>http://divisionbyzero.net/blog/2007/10/18/pittsburgh-perl-workshop-2007/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Moertel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 03:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divisionbyzero.net/blog/2007/10/18/pittsburgh-perl-workshop-2007/#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Brad,

I thought your talk was great. I missed the end because of my conference-organizer duties, but what I saw impressed me. You took an interesting topic and presented it in a way that *kept* it interesting. That's the way to do it.

The way you piled up the real-world constraints until they crushed the perfect-world security models that people carry around in their heads was particularly instructive: it helped the audience *see* that real-world security is messy and must accommodate stuff that nobody can anticipate. That's why the sane approach is to be nimble, monitor what's going on, and be prepared to solve problems as they reveal themselves.

Very cool talk.

Cheers,
Tom

BTW, I will be sorely disappointed if you don't submit a talk for next year's PPW.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad,</p>
<p>I thought your talk was great. I missed the end because of my conference-organizer duties, but what I saw impressed me. You took an interesting topic and presented it in a way that *kept* it interesting. That&#8217;s the way to do it.</p>
<p>The way you piled up the real-world constraints until they crushed the perfect-world security models that people carry around in their heads was particularly instructive: it helped the audience *see* that real-world security is messy and must accommodate stuff that nobody can anticipate. That&#8217;s why the sane approach is to be nimble, monitor what&#8217;s going on, and be prepared to solve problems as they reveal themselves.</p>
<p>Very cool talk.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Tom</p>
<p>BTW, I will be sorely disappointed if you don&#8217;t submit a talk for next year&#8217;s PPW.  ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Wright</title>
		<link>http://divisionbyzero.net/blog/2007/10/18/pittsburgh-perl-workshop-2007/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divisionbyzero.net/blog/2007/10/18/pittsburgh-perl-workshop-2007/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>I only saw bits and pieces as I was in and out, but I heard great reviews.

-Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only saw bits and pieces as I was in and out, but I heard great reviews.</p>
<p>-Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
